2025 1(48) 12

Ways and tools for improving the effectiveness of social responsibility at the regional-territorial level (SRRT) or Сorporatism at industrial enterprises of united territorial communities (UTC) is a means of influencing the effectiveness of their functioning

Bohdan Mykolayovych Andrushkiv
Dr. of Economics, Prof.
ORCІD https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4897-5539
e-maіl: andrushkіv.bohdan@gmaіl.com,
Nataliya Bogdanivna Kyrych
Dr. of Economics, Prof.
ORCІD https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7728-9787
e-maіl: nkuruch@gmaіl.com,
Olga Bogdanivna Pohaidak
Dr. of Economics, Senior Researcher
ORCІD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4070-6863
e-maіl: pog.ola77@gmaіl.com,
Ostap Bogdanovych Boiko
Candidate of Economics in Science, PhD
ORCІD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2327-5942
e-maіl: Ostapboyko@gmaіl.com,
Pavlo Viktorovych Yakymuk
postgraduate
е-maіl: pidguzka@ukr.net,
Ternopil National Technical University named after Ivan Pulyuy

Citation Format
Andrushkіv, B. M., Kyrych, N. B., Pohaіdak, O. B., Boіko, O. B., Yаkymuk, P. V. (2025). Ways and tools for improving the effectiveness of social responsibility at the regional-territorial level (SRRT) or Сorporatism at industrial enterprises of united territorial communities (UTC) is a means of influencing the effectiveness of their functioning. Vіsnyk ekonomіchnoі nauky Ukraіny, 1 (48), рр. 49-55. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2025.1(48).49-55

Language
 Ukrainian

Resume
The article makes an attempt to investigate the peculiarities of the development of social responsibility in regional and territorial conditions (localization of the association of territorial communities) during the martial law and in the post-war period. They identified its main manifestations and proposed measures not only to speed up their implementation in today’s realities in Ukraine, but also in the context of Ukraine’s accession to NATO and the EU. The regional-territorial level of corporate social responsibility of business during the war is substantiated as a necessary component of the effective activity of economic entities in these conditions. Ways, tools and means of activating the development of social responsibility in the conditions of territorial enterprises and organizations are proposed. The directions for increasing its level in war and post-war conditions have been determined. The improvement of social responsibility mechanisms and the organization of relations between state authorities, self-government bodies, trade unions, politicians, and other public associations are proposed. Tools for sharing responsibility between them are recommended, which can significantly contribute to increasing the level of cooperation.
Taking into account Ukraine’s future accession to NATO and the EU, the expediency of forming the mentioned mechanisms is substantiated based on international experience. The information base of the process should reflect the current state of the socio-economic development of business entities in the context of increasing the economic competitiveness of national enterprises in the European environment and taking into account the requirements of restoring production and service infrastructure, improving the quality of life of the population, as well as the capabilities of operational management response to the challenges of wartime.

Keywords
Social responsibility, regional-territorial level, management, united territorial community, business, corporation, war, EU, NATO, directions, ways, mechanisms.

Referensces

  1. Amosha, O., Novikova, O. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist v konteksti rozvytku liudskoho potentsialu. [Social responsibility in the context of human potential development]. Derzhava i suspilstvo – State and society, 1, рр. 122-127. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/soc_gum/pubupr/2011-1/doc/3/01.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  2. Baіura, D. O. (2013). Formuvannia systemy korporatyvnoho upravlinnia na zasadakh sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti. [Formation of the corporate management system based on social responsibility]. Visnyk Kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. Tarasa Shevchenka. Seriia «Ekonomika» – Bulletin of Kyiv National University named after Taras Shevchenko. Series “Economics”, 10, рр. 18–22 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Bebyk, V. (2006). Derzhava i hromadianske suspilstvo: partnerski komunikatsii u hlobalnomu [State and civil society: partner communications in the global world]. Kyiv, Institute of Civil Society. 248 p. [in Ukrainian].
  4. Belіavska, K. S. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu: evoliutsiia pohliadiv na problemu [Social responsibility of business: evolution of views on the problem]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Khmelnytskyi National University, 1, рр. 228–233 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Bilіavskyі, V. (2009). Pidvyshchennia rivnia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti torhovelnoho pidpryiemstva [Increasing the level of social responsibility of a trade enterprise]. Visnyk KNTEU – Bulletin of KNTEU, 5, рр. 84–91 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Budonna, L. (2008). Shliakhy ta napriamy formuvannia sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu v Ukraini [Ways and directions of formation of social responsibility of business in Ukraine]. Sotsialna polityka – Social policy, 8, pp. 9–10 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Vergun, L. I. (2010). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v umovakh hlobalnoi finansovo-ekonomichnoi kryzy [Social responsibility of business in the conditions of the global financial and economic crisis]. Teoretychni ta prykladni pytannia ekonomiky – Theoretical and applied issues of economics, Vol. 23, рр. 165–170 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Voloskovets, N. Yu. (2010). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist pidpryiemstv yak osnova innovatsiinoho rozvytku suchasnoi ekonomiky [Corporate social responsibility of enterprises as a basis for innovative development of the modern economy]. Naukovi pratsi KNTU. Ekonomichni nauky – Sciences works of KNTU. Economic sciences, Issue 17, рр. 125–131. Retrieved from http://www.kntu.kr.ua/doc/zb_17_ekon/index.html [in Ukrainian].
  9. Vorobeі, V. (2009). Sotsialna zvitnist: stan ta perspektyvy [Social reporting: status and prospects]. Proceedings of the meetings of the UN Global Compact network. Kyiv. 11 p. [in Ukrainian].
  10. Hidna pratsia – osnova sotsialnoho dobrobutu ta ekonomichnoho prohresu: prohramna rezoliutsiia VI Zizdu Federatsii profesiinykh spilok Ukrainy vid 24.03.2011 № 6 [Decent work is the basis of social well-being and economic progress: program resolution of the VI Congress of the Federation of Trade Unions of Ukraine dated March 24, 2011 No. 6]. Retrieved from http://www.fpsu.org.ua/dokumentifpu/programnirezolyutsiji-ta-postanovi-vi-z-jizdu-federatsiji-profesijnikh-spilokukrajini [in Ukrainian].
  11. Horokhova, T. V. (2014). Otsinka vprovadzhennia korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti na promyslovykh pidpryiemstvakh [Assessment of implementation of corporate social responsibility at industrial enterprises]: Candidate’s thesis. Mariupol, 220 p. [in Ukrainian].
  12. Hrinenko, A. M. (2012). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi aspekt otsiniuvannia sotsialnoi diialnosti [Corporate social performance: theoretical and methodological aspects of social performance assessment]. Formuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky: Spets. vyp. Pratsia v ХХI stolitti: novitni tendentsii, sotsialnyi vymir, innovatsiinyi rozvytok [Formation of market economy: Spec. Issue Work in the XXI capital: new trends, social trends, innovation development]: in 2 volumes. (Vol. 2, рр. 58 – 68). Kyiv, KNEU [in Ukrainian].
  13. Hrytsyna, L. A. (2009). Mekhanizm formuvannia korporatyvnoi sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti v upravlinni pidpryiemstvom [The mechanism for forming corporate social responsibility in enterprise management]: Candidate’s thesis. Khmelnytskyі. 220 p. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Humenna, O. V. Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v konteksti innovatsiinoho rozvytku ekonomiky [Social re sponsibility of business in the context of innovative economic development]. Retrieved from http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/portal/Soc_Gum/Nvamu/Ekon/2009_7/09gavdoe.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  15. Hrishnova, O. A., Dumanska, V. P. (2011). Ekolohichnyi vektor sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti [Ecological vector of social responsibility]. Economy and management, 3, рр. 32–41 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Zinchenko, A. Н., Saprykinа, М. А. (2010). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist 2005–2010: stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Corporate social responsibility 2005–2010: state and development prospects]. Kyiv, Painted letter. 56 p. [in Ukrainian].
  17. Kotler, F., Lee, N. (2005). Korporatyvna sotsialna vidpovidalnist. Yak zrobyty yakomoha bilshe dobra dlia vashoi kompanii ta suspilstva [Corporate social responsibility. How to do as much good as possible for your company and society]. Trans. from English. Kyiv, Standart. 209 p. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Korol, S. (2013). Instytutsiinyi pidkhid do sotsialnoi vidpovidalnosti biznesu. [Institutional approach to social responsibility of business]. Visnyk KNTEU – Bulletin KNTEU, 3, рр. 42–55 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Omelchuk, O. M. (2012). Pravo ta moral yak rehuliatory povedinky liudyny [Law and morality as regulators of human behavior]. Pravo i bezpeka – Law and security, 5 (47), рр. 25–28 [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (.pdf)

Received: 20.01.2025
Accepted: 23.02.2025
Published: 19.06.2025