2024 2(47) 7

Sustainable Development of the Coast and Park and Recreational Areas in the Context of Using Ecosystem Services of the Blue Economy

Petrushenko М. M.
Doctor of Economic Sciences
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-7872
e-mail: petrushenkom@gmail.com,
State Organization “Institute Of Market And Economic&Ecological Researches of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”

Citation Format
Petrushenko, М. M. (2024). Sustainable Development of the Coast and Park and Recreational Areas in the Context of Using Ecosystem Services of the Blue Economy. Vіsnyk ekonomіchnoі nauky Ukraіny, 2 (47), рр. 54-62. DOІ: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2024.2(47).54-62

Language
Ukrainian

Resume
The article presents the results of the substantiation of the sustainable development factors of the coast and park and recreation areas in the context of the use of ecosystem services of the blue economy, in particular, the conceptual relationship between integrated and strategic approaches to the natural asset management, which provide ‘blue’ ecosystem services, is revealed; and the elements of natural infrastructure and nature based solutions within the framework of sustainable development of the coast and park and recreation areas related to climate change and anthropogenic impact on the environment in coastal territorial communities are also highlighted. The developed matrix for making relevant nature based solutions, depending on the needs of the community, the state of the infrastructure and situational factors, is a set of relationships between the types of services (such as managing the quality of stormwater runoff, ensuring the quality of recreation, local economic development, etc.) and strategies for natural asset managing (from today’s most common priority strategy of gray infrastructure in its combination with elements of green infrastructure – to the strategy of balanced combination of gray, green and natural infrastructure). The provisions on improving the management of relevant natural assets are substantiated, namely regarding: their inventory with the prioritization of individual natural assets depending on the needs and financial and organizational capacity of the community; application of an integrated approach to determining the unique characteristics of natural assets, primarily in the context of the use of previously unidentified ecosystem services; comprehensive consideration of factors supporting local government initiatives in the field of natural asset management.

Keywords
ecosystem services, blue economy, park and recreation areas, sustainable coastal development.

Referensces

  1. On a new approach for a sustainable blue economy in the EU Transforming the EU’s Blue Economy for a Sustainable Future COM/2021/240 final Document 52021DC0240. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions. (2021). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2021:240:FIN.
  2. Sryberko, A. (2023). Determination of criteria for assessing the sustainability of the blue economy within the framework of the protection of the Ukrainian  sea coast. Grail of Science, 34, рр. 27–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.08.12.2023.01.
  3. Petrushenko, M. M., Voroshylo, L. S. (2015). Environmental-economic conflict: conceptual complexity and management issues. Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 3. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/42346.
  4. Green recovery for Ukraine. (n.d.). NEFCO. Retrieved from https://www.nefco.int/financing/municipalities-in-easterneurope/green-recovery-ukraine/.
  5. Ukraine needs a sustainable, climate and nature-positive reconstruction: New WWF/BCG report. (2022). WWF. Retrieved from https://www.wwf.eu/?7631816/Ukraine-needs-a-sustainable-climate-and-nature-positive-reconstruction-New-WWFBCG-report.
  6. Partnership for green recovery. (n.d.). Greenpeace. Retrieved from https://www.greenreconstruction.com/.
  7. Brears, R. C. (2021). Developing the blue economy. Palgrave Macmillan. 337 p.
  8. Integrating natural asset management into council asset management systems. Investigation report. (2018). Cardno. Retrieved from https://lgnsw.org.au/common/Uploaded%20files/REM_files/Natural_Assets_Report.pdf.
  9. Developing levels of service for natural assets. A guidebook for local governments. (2022). MNAI. Retrieved from https://mnai.ca/media/2022/01/MNAI-Levels-of-Service-Neptis.pdf.
  10. Natural infrastructure framework: keyconcepts, definitions and terms. (2021). CCME. Retrieved from https://ccme.ca/en/natural-infrastructure-framework-key-concepts-definitions-and-terms.
  11. Prokopenko, O., Petrushenko, M. (2013). Sys temno-synerhetychnyi pidkhid do upravlinnia ekolohich nymy protyrichchiamy na terytorialnomu rivni [Systems-synergetic thinking to the environmental conflicts manage ment at the territorial level]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii – Marketing and Management of Innovations, 1, рр. 254–266. Retrieved from https://mmi.sumdu.edu.ua/ua/uammi/volume-4-issue-1/article-24/ [in Ukrainian].
  12. Kyslyi, V. M., Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Rol ta mistse pryrodno-rekreatsiinoi sfery v systemi terytorialno-ekonomichnykh vidnosyn [The role and place of the natural-recreational sphere in the system of territorial-economic relations]. Ekolohichnyi menedzhment u zahalnii systemi upravlinnia [Environmental management in the overall management system]: Proceedings of the VII Annual All-Ukrainian Scientific Conference. (рр. 31–34). Sumy, SumDU. Retrieved from http://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7894 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Shevchenko, H. M. (2017). Prohnozuvannia rozvytku rekreatsii v Ukraini: sotsialno-ekonomichnyi ekvilibrium [Forecasting of recreation development in Ukraine: socioeconomic equilibrium]. Sumy, Universytetska knyha. 336 p. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Petrushenko, M. M. (2011). Neobkhidnist i osoblyvosti zastosuvannya teorii ihor pry modelyuvanni pryrodno-resursnykh konfliktiv [Necessity and features of application of game theory in modeling of natural-resource conflicts]. Vistnyk SumDU. Serija Ekonomikа, 3, рр. 42–48. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/23223 [in Ukrainian].
  15. Kyslyi, V. M., Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Analiz peredumov formunannya rynku rekreatsiynykh posluh v Ukrayni [Analysis of the preconditions for the formation of recreational services market in Ukraine]. Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky – Mechanism of economic regulation, 2, рр. 27–36. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/3127 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Petrushenko, M. M., Shevchenko, H. M. et al. (2019). The forming of industrial and national natural parks networks in Ukraine based on the principles for responsible investment. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 31(4), рр. 221–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i31.190880.
  17. Bartczak, A., Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S. et al. (2008). Valuing forest recreation on the national level in a transition economy: The case of Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 10 (7–8), рр. 467–472. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2008.04.002.
  18. Zambrano-Monserrate, M. A., Silva-Zambrano, C. A., Ruano, M. A. (2018). The economic value of natural protected areas in Ecuador: A case of Villamil Beach National Recreation Area. Ocean & Coastal Management, 157, рр. 193–202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.02.020.
  19. Tardieu, L., Tuffery, L. (2019). From supply to demand factors: What are the determinants of attractiveness for outdoor recreation? Ecological Economics, 161, рр. 163–175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.03.022.
  20. Sangha, K. K., Stoeckl, N., Crossman, N., Costanza, R. (2019). A state-wide economic assessment of coastal and marine ecosystem services to inform sustainable development policies in the Northern Territory, Australia. Marine Policy, 107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103595.
  21. Shevchenko, H. M. (2017). Regulatory policy and optimization of investment resource allocation in model of functioning recreation industry. Baltic Journal of Economic Science, 3 (1), рр. 109–115. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2017-3-1-109-115.
  22. Heagney, E. C., Rose, J. M., Ardeshiri, A., Kovac, M. (2019). The economic value of tourism and recreation across a large protected area network. Land Use Policy, 88, Paper 104084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104084.
  23. The future we don’t want. UCCRN technical report. (2018). Urban Climate Change Research Network. Retrieved from https://www.c40.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/1789_Future_We_Dont_Want_Report_1.4_hi-res_120618.original-compressed.pdf.
  24. City Resilience Program. (2020). World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/disasterriskmanagement/brief/city-resilience-program.
  25. Integrating natural assets into asset management. (2019). Asset Management BC. Retrieved from https://www.assetmanagementbc.ca/wp-content/uploads/Integrating-Natural-Assets-into-Asset-Management.pdf.
  26. Sryberko, A. (2023). Conceptual foundations for the use of GIS technologies for the study of coastal ecosystems of the Azov-Black Sea Basin in the framework of blue growth. Economic Innovations, 25 (4(89)), рр. 86–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31520/ei.2023.25.4(89).86-96.
  27. Sryberko, A., Stepanova, Yu. (2023). The role of GIS technologies in determining economic and environmental risks within the blue economy. Grail of Science, 33, рр. 43–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36074/grail-of-science.10.11.2023.04.
  28. Shevchenko, H. M., Reznik, O. M. (2015). Ensuring state economic security in the area of taxation: agent-based and subject-based legal approaches. Aktual Problems of Economics, 168 (6), рр. 167–172. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2015_6_23.
  29. Shevchenko, H. M. (2007). Pryntsypy pobudovy orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnoho mekhanizmu formuvannia ta vykorystannia pryrodno-rekreatsiinoho potentsialu terytorii [The principles of construction the organizational-economic mechanism of forming and using the nature-recreational potential of the territory]. Visnyk Sumskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia Ekonomika – Bulletin of Sumy State University. Economy Series, 1, рр. 60–66. Retrieved from https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/1866 [in Ukrainian].
  30. Tittensor, D. P., Beger, M., Boerder, K. et al. (2019). Integrating climate adaptation and biodiversity conservation in the global ocean. Science Advances, 5, рр. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay9969.
  31. Schafer, C. T. (2018). Perspective on warm climate intervals and their history: How might coastal Canada adapt to an ocean-related and potentially negative impact of predicted warmer conditions? Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science, Vol. 49, no. 2, рр. 205–228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15273/pnsis.v49i2.8160.
  32. Powell, E. J., Tyrrell, M. C., Milliken, A. et al. (2019). A review of coastal management approaches to  support the integration of ecological and human community planning for climate change. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 23, рр. 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11852-018-0632-y.
  33. Sutton-Grier, A. E, Wowk, K., Bamford, H. (2015). Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, рр. 137–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.006.
  34. Best practices and resources on climate resilient natural infrastructure. (2018). Winnipeg, MB: ICF for CCME. Retrieved from https://ccme.ca/en/resources.
  35. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. (2005). Washington, Island Press.
  36. Arkema, K. K., Guannel, G., Verutes, G. et al. (2013). Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nature and Climate Change, 3, рр. 913–918. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1944.
  37. Atkinson, D. E., Forbes, D. L., James, T. S. (2016). Dynamic coasts in a changing climate. (pp. 27–68). In Canada’s Marine Coasts in a Changing Climate. D. S. Lemmen et al. (Eds.). Mercer-Clarke. Ottawa,  ON: Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.nrcan.gc.ca/sites/www.nrcan.gc.ca/files/earthsciences/files/pdf/NRCAN_fullBook%20%20accessible.pdf.
  38. Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y. et al. (2019). Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 37, рр. 3–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011.
  39. Urban water quality best management practices. (2017). Kansas State University. Retrieved from https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/pubs/MF2732.pdf.
  40. Urban forest systems and green stormwater infrastructure. (2020). USDA. Retrieved from https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/fs_media/fs_document/Urban-Forest-Systems-GSI-FS-1146.pdf%23page27

Full Text (.pdf)

Received: 28.10.2024
Accepted: 29.11.2024
Published: 23.12.2024