2024 2(47) 24

Conditions, Logic and Methodological Support For the Development and Implementation of the “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan”

Chebotarov Iе. V.
Doctor, Adjunct PhD Student
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-7637
e-mail: iegor.chebotarov@wz.uni.lodz.pl,
University of Lodz, Poland, Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

Citation Format
Chebotarov, Iе. V. (2024). Conditions, Logic and Methodological Support For the Development and Implementation of the “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan”. Vіsnyk ekonomіchnoі nauky Ukraіny, 2 (47), рр. 184-192. DOІ: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2024.2(47).184-192

Language
 Ukrainian

Resume
Analysis and generalization of the trends in the development of the global economy and geopolitics provides epistemological and scientific and practical grounds to conclude that the absence of a strategically oriented and at the same time as specific in content regulatory and legal document “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan” poses a challenge and threat not only to Ukraine. At the same time, the “Ukraine Recovery Plan”, presented to the Ukraine Reform Conference URC 2022 in Lugano, in its final document “Lugano Declaration” was rightly defined as a ” Recovery and Development Plan draft”, which “requires consultations and adaptability”. Another one – Ukraine Facility Plan is not strategic by itself, because it is initially limited in time to the period 2024-2027.
World experience shows that the specificity of such strategically oriented plans is ensured, first of all, by the implementation of a set of instruments-regimes aimed at achieving specifically set tasks within clearly defined time periods. Thus, in a focused definition, this projection presents a complex interdisciplinary and intercultural problem of economic regimeology regarding the elaboration on the basis of generalization of the relevant world experience of economic regimes for the development and implementation of the “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan”.
The purpose of the article: on the basis of an analysis of the world experience of the post-war development of the countries of Europe and the Indo-Pacific subregion, to identify economic regimes for the purpose of further development of the “Ukraine’s Post-war Recovery Plan” and to determine approaches to methodologically ensuring their implementation in domestic practice.
The novelty of the article is the identification of the instruments and regimes of post-war development of Ukraine (with a classification of the most important of them) and the elaboration of the foundations of methodological support for the practical implementation of economic regimeology using the concept and applied tools of anticipatory management.

Keywords
economic regimeology, anticipatory management, post-war recovery, plan, Ukraine.

Referensces

  1. Outcome Document of the Ukraine Recovery Conference URC2022. Lugano Declaration. (2022). Retrived from https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/621f88db25fbf24758792dd8/62c68e41bd53305e8d214994_URC2022%20Lugano%20Declaration.pdf.
  2. Plan for Ukraine Facility 2024-2027. (2024). Ministry of Economy of Ukraine. Retrived from https://www.ukrainefacility.me.gov.ua/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/plan-ukraine-facility.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  3. Ivanov, S. V. (2019). Ekonomichne vidnovlennia i rozvytok krain pislia zbroinykh konfliktiv ta voien: nevtracheni mozhlyvosti dlia Ukrainy [Economic recovery and development of countries after armed conflicts and wars: unlost opportunities for Ukraine]. Ekon. Ukr., 1, pp. 75-89 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Horodnichenko, Yu., Sologub, I., di Mauro, B. V. (Eds.). (2022). Vidbudova Ukrainy: pryntsypy ta polityka [The Rebuilding of Ukraine: Principles and Policy]. The Paris Report 1. CEPR Press. Retrived from https://cepr.org/system/files/2022-12/reconstruction%20book_Ukrainian_0.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  5. Kindzerskyi, Yu. (2022). Povoienne vidnovlennia promyslovosti Ukrainy: vyklyky ta osoblyvosti polityky [Postwar recovery of Ukraine’s industry: challenges and features of policy]. Ekonomichnyi analiz – Economic analysis, 32 (2), pp. 101-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/econa2022.02.101 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Borodina, O. A., Lіashenko, V. I. (2022). Povoienne vidnovlennia ekonomiky: svitovyi dosvid ta sproba yoho adaptatsii dlia Ukrainy [Post-War Economic Recovery: World Experience and Attempt to Adapt it for Ukraine]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 1 (42), рр. 121-134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2022.1(42).121-134 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Lіashenko, V., Chebotarov, Iе. (2023). Svitovyi dosvid povoiennoho vidnovlennia: dialektyka implementatsii ta adaptatsii v Ukraini [The world experience of post-war recovery: the dialectic of implementation and adaptation in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3(73), рр. 122-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2023-3(73)-122-131 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Lіashenko, V. I. (2007). Regulirovaniye razvitiya malogo predprinimatel’stva v Ukraine: problemy i puti resheniya [Regulation of small business development in Ukraine: problems and solutions]. Donetsk, ІIE of NAS of Ukraine. 451 р. [in Russian].
  9. Lіashenko, V. I. (2012). Finansovo-regulyatornyye rezhimy stimulirovaniya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya: vvedeniye v ekonomicheskuyu rezhimologiyu [Financial and regulatory regimes for stimulating economic development: introduction to economic regimeology]. Donetsk, ІIE of NAS of Ukraine. 370 р. [in Russian].
  10. «Marshall Plan». Economic Cooperation Act of 1948, 62 Stat. 137, U.S. Statutes at Large. Pub. L. 80-472, U.S. Law. Retrived from https://web.archive.org/web/20150119113837/ http://legisworks.org/congress/80/publaw-472.pdf.
  11. Erhard, L. (2013). Germany’s Comeback in the World Market: The German ‘miracle’ explained by the Bonn Minister for Economics. Routledge.
  12. Dodge, J. (1952). Announcement on budget. 1949, April 15. In Keizai Saiken Kenkyukai (Ed.). Pore kara Daresu e [From Pauley to Dulles]. Tokyo, Diamondsha. P. 268.
  13. Revilla Diez, J. (2016). Vietnam 30 years after Doi Moi: achievements and challenges. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 60(3), pp.121-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw-2016-0035.
  14. Kmezić, M. (2021). Rule of law and democracy in the Western Balkans: addressing the gap between policies and practice. In Illiberal Politics in Southeast Europe (pp. 177-192). Routledge.
  15. Morgenthau, H. (1944). «Suggested Post-Surrender Program for Germany [The original memorandum from 1944, signed by Morgenthau] (text and facsimile)». Box 31, Folder Germany: Jan.-Sept. 1944 (i297). Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library and Museum (published 27 May 2004).
  16. Kakha Bendukidze ta yoho «hruzynske dyvo» [Kakha Bendukidze and his “Georgian miracle”]. Retrived from https://www.bbc.com/russian/international/2014/11/141114_bendukidze_georgia_minister_death [in Ukrainian].
  17. Ladejinsky, W. (1972). Land ceilings and land reform. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 401-408.
  18. Derzhavne ahentstvo z vidnovlennia ta rozvytku infrastruktury Ukrainy [State agency for the renewal and development of infrastructure in Ukraine]. Retrieved from https://restoration.gov.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
  19. Liashenko, V., Pidorycheva, I., Mytsenko, I., Chebotarova, N. (2021). The Modern Concept of Special Economic Zones in Ukraine. Bulletin of Geography. Socio-Economic Series, 52(52), рр. 85-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bog-2021-0015.
  20. Kolosov, A. M. (2010). Orhanizatsiina povedinka pidpryiemstva v umovakh minlyvoho seredovyshcha (150 pytan teorii i praktyky orhanizatsii) [Organizational behavior of the enterprise in the conditions of a changing environment (150 questions of the theory and practice of the organization]. Luhansk, Publishing House of the V. Dahl SNU. 344 p. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Kamińska, B., Yakubovskiy, M., Liashenko, V., Kvilinskyi, O. (2017). Economy modernization of industrial regions (based on the example of Ukraine). In: P. Głowski, O. Kvilinskyi, eds. Economic transformation in Ukraine: comparative analysis and European experience.  (pp. 12-29). Warsaw, Consilium Sp. z o.o.
  22. Kolosov, A., Dugin, A., Chebotaryov, V. (2022). Ekonomichni obstavyny formuvannia mizhnarodnoho planu Marshalla z pisliavoiennoho vidnovlennia Ukrainy [Economic circumstances of the formation of the international Marshall Plan for the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3 (69), pp. 131-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2022-3(69)-131-140 [in Ukrainian].
  23. Kolosov, A. M., Chebotarov, Ie. V. (2023). Antysypatyvnyi menedzhment – diieva kontseptsiia rozrobky i realizatsii polityky povoiennoho vidnovlennia Ukrainy. [Anticipatory Management as an Effective Concept for the Development and Implementation of Ukraine’s Post-War Recovery Policy]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas. 2 (72), pp. 162-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2023-2(72)-162-171 [in Ukrainian].
  24. Chebotarov, Ie.V. (2024). Kontseptsiia antysypatyvnoho menedzhmentu yak paradyhma upravlinnia v umovakh viiny ta povoiennoho vidnovlennia Ukrainy [The concept of anticipatory management as a management paradigm in the conditions of war and post-war recovery of Ukraine]. Transformatsiia praktyky upravlinnia innovatsiinym rozvytkom sotsialno-ekonomichnykh system [Transformation of the practice of management of innovative development of socio-economic systems]. (рр. 287-298). Kyiv, Publishing House “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy” [in Ukrainian].
  25. Chebotarov, V. (2011). Derzhavna rehuliatorna polityka innovatsiinoi strukturnoi transformatsii kharchovoi ta pererobnoi promyslovosti [State regulatory policy for innovative structural transformation of the food and processing industry]. Luhansk, Luhanskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Tarasa Shevchenka. 448 p. [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (.pdf)

Received: 27.11.2024
Accepted: 18.12.2024
Published: 23.12.2024