2023 2(45) 8

Peculiarities of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Operational Improvements

Latysheva O. V.
PhD in Economic Sciences, assistant professor
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6626-1420
e-mail: kramalena1970@gmail.com,
Chupryna Yu. V.
PhD in Economic Sciences, assistant professor
ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1852-8503,
LLC “Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic”, Zaporizhzhya

Citation Format
Latysheva, O. V., Chupryna, Yu. V. (2023). Peculiarities of Evaluating the Effectiveness of Operational Improvements. Vіsnyk ekonomіchnoі nauky Ukraіny, 2 (45), рр. 67-76. DOІ: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2023.2(45).67-76

Language
 Ukrainian

Resume
The article is devoted to a review of approaches to the formation of a system for evaluating the effectiveness of operational improvements of the enterprise. The authors suggested evaluating the effectiveness of operational improvements as a result of operational decision-making. The article examines the essence of the concept of «operational decisions», considers the main types of operational decisions and methods of their evaluation at enterprises. A generalized system of indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of operational decisions. It was determined that the main goal of such a system is to ensure management efficiency and help make effective management decisions to achieve the planned goals of the enterprise.
It is noted that in order to ensure the effectiveness of the adopted operational improvements, the enterprise should establish cooperation and communication, improve the data collection and analysis system as a guarantee of adopting a high-quality operational decision. It has been proven that for this it is expedient to use modern information technologies, digitization tools for analysis, modeling and data processing, data visualization tools and their forecasting.
The scientific novelty of this article lies in the fact that the recommendations and conclusions provided by the authors can be useful for enterprises that wish to improve their own decision-making systems, review the current decision-making evaluation criteria for the implementation of operational improvements.

Keywords
operational improvements, operational decisions, types of operational decisions, KPI, evaluation methods, evaluation indicators.

Referensces

  1. Havlovska, N. et al. (2022). Suchasni tekhnolohii upravlinnia resursamy promyslovykh pidpryiemstv na zasadakh oshchadlyvoho vyrobnytstva [Modern technologies of resource management of industrial enterprises based on lean production]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Khmelnytskyi National University, No. 5, Vol. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2022-310-5(1)-49 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Hirna, O. (2023). Kontseptsiia kaidzen: teoretychni ta prykladni aspekty [The concept of kaizen: theoretical and applied aspects]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, (54). DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-54-87 [in Ukrainian].
  3. Osokina, A., Sklym, M. (2022). Systema operatsiinoho vdoskonalennia yak instrument postiinoho pokrashchennia biznes-protsesiv kompanii [Operational improvement system as a tool for continuous improvement of the company’s business processes]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo – Economy and society, 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-70 [in Ukrainian].
  4. Senyk, Yu. (2023). Vykorystannia metodiv LEAN na prykladi kaidzen [Using LEAN methods on the example of kaizen]. Ekonomichnyi prostir – Economic space, 183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/183-9 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Shashina, M. V., Fedotov, O. Yu. (2018). Zastosuvannia kontseptsii kaidzen menedzhmentu dlia pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti diialnosti vitchyznianykh pidpryiemstv [Application of the concept of kaizen management to increase the efficiency of domestic enterprises]. Agrosvit, No. 7. Retrieved from http://www.agrosvit.info/pdf/7_2018/5.pdf (access date: 09/01/2023) [in Ukrainian].
  6. Materials of the Lean Global Network official website. Retrieved from https://leanglobal.org/.
  7. The Lean Global Network Journal. Planet Lean. Retrieved from https://www.planet-lean.com/.
  8. Kaizen Institute. Retrieved from https://kaizen.com/.
  9. Materials of the official websites of Metinvest Group enterprises (including Continuous improvement. Metallurgical plant “AZOVSTAL”. Retrieved from https://azovstal.metinvestholding.com/ru/development/improvement; Continuous improvement. Southern mining and processing plant. Retrieved from https://www.ugok.com.ua/ua/development/improvement.php; Continuous improvement. PJSC Zaporizhstal. Retrieved from https://zaporizhstal.com/pidpriyemstvo/rozvitok/bezperervne-vdoskonalennya/) [in Ukrainian].
  10. Masaaki, Imai. (2007). Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense Approach to a Continuous Improvement Strategy. McGraw Hill. 325 р.
  11. Taiichi, Ohno. (2019). The Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Productivity Press. 176 p.
  12. James P. Womack, Daniel T. Jones. (2003). Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation. Free Press. 396 р.
  13. Kaizen dictionary. Retrieved from https://ua.kaizen.com/learn-kaizen/glossary.
  14. Masaaki, Imai. (1986). Kaizen: The Key To Japan’s Competitive Success. McGraw Hill. 260 p.
  15. Arbidane, I. (2015). Management of current assets in the context of increasing the Enterprise’s Profitability. Rezekne Higher Education Institution. Rēzeknes Augstskola, Vol. 2(264), рр. 102-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17770/etr2015vol2.264.
  16. Narasimhaiah, T. (2017). A comparative analysis of the impact of Current Assets and Fixed Assets on Working Capital of Textile companies in India. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. 7(117), рр. 263-272.
  17. Nobanee, H. (2014). Current Assets management of small enterprises. Journal of Economics studies, Vol. 42(4), рp. 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-02-2013-0028.
  18. Prokhorova, V., Bozhanova, O., Putro, A., Dalyk, V., Yukhman, Ya. & Azizova, K. (2021). Methodological aspects of assessing the sustainable development of energy companies. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. Vol. 628(1). DOI: https://doi:10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012011.
  19. 25 Most Important Quality KPIs & Metrics: analytical materials of the website «SOMEKA». (2023, June 20). Retrieved from https://www.someka.net/blog/quality-kpis/.
  20. 25 Most Important Quality Metrics (KPIs): analytical materials of the website LinkedIn. (2023). Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7081844082167185408.
  21. Chase, R. B., Jacobs, F. R., Aquilano, N. J. (2006). Operations management for competitive advantage. McGraw-Hill. 720 р. Retrieved from https://www.mheducation.com/highered/product/operations-management-competitive-advantage-chase-jacobs-aquilano/0073403385.html.
  22. Zosym, Maxym. (2023). Key Performance Indicators – KPIs. Retrieved from https://www.maxzosim.com/key-performance-indicators-kpis/.
  23. Gary Cokins. (2009) Performance Management: Integrating Strategy Execution, Methodologies, Risk, and Analytics. 3rd ed. Wiley. 272 р.
  24. Stevenson, W. J. (2018). Operations management. 13th ed. McGraw-Hill. 912 р.
  25. Olve, N., Roy, J., Wetter, M. (2003). Performance drivers: A practical guide to using the balanced scorecard. John Wiley & Sons. 352 р.
  26. Marr, B., Neely, A. (2004). Exploring the integration of the balanced scorecard and total quality management. Journal of business excellence, vol. 8(2), рр. 44-56.
  27. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS quarterly, vol. 28(2), рр. 283-322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25148636.
  28. Pardede, E. (2010). Business performance management systems: a conceptual framework. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research, Vol. 3, pр. 70-81. 

Full Text (.pdf)