2022 1 (42) 1

Smart Specializations from the Standpoint of Leading Schools of Economic Theory

Vyshnevskyi O. S.
Doctor of Economic Sciences
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2375-6033
e-mail: allexxandr@gmail.com,
Institute of Industrial Economics of the NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv

Citation Format
Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2022). Smart Specializations from the Standpoint of Leading Schools of Economic Theory. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 1 (42), рр. 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2022.1(42).3-8

Language
Ukrainian

Resume
Focus on smart specialization is a key element of regional development strategizing in Ukraine, which, for example, is reflected in the State Regional Development Strategy for 2021-2027. But a comparative analysis of individual indicators of the economic development of the EU, the USA and China shows that smart specialization itself is not a competitive advantage on a global scale. At the same time, the researchers note that there is a gap  between the theory and the practice of strategizing on the basis of smart specialization. Although theoretical issues related to smart specialization are not overlooked by researchers, the direct understanding of smart specialization processes from the standpoint of specific schools of economic theory is extremely limited. Therefore, the goal of the study is to reduce the essence of the concept of smart specialization from the standpoint of leading schools of economic theory.
For the analysis, a classification was chosen, according to which 9 schools of economic theory are distinguished: (1) Classical, (2) Neoclassical, (3) Marxist,  (4) Developmentalist, (5) Austrian, (6) Schumpeterian,  (7) Keynesian, (8) Institutionalist, (9) Behaviouralist.
Of the nine considered leading schools of economic theory, almost half of the schools (Classical, Developmentalist, Schumpeterian, and Institutionalist) significantly influenced the formation of the essence of smart specialization. Smart specialization has been moderately influenced by Neoclassical, Marxist and Keynesian schools. Austrian and Behaviouralist schools are characterized by a slight influence on smart specialization.
Thus, smart specialization to a significant or moderate degree corresponds to individual provisions of 7 out of the 9 leading schools of economic theory considered in this study. Smart specialization synthesizes the positions of different schools of economic theory.
Two alternatives follow from this: either the concept of smart specialization is a “constructive” tool for combining the “best” practices of various schools of economic theory, or it is an eclectic combination of ideas that are fundamentally incompatible. An unambiguous solution to this dilemma is possible on a practical level in the long term.

Keywords
smart specialization, schools of economic theory, definition, reduction.

Referensces

  1. Pro zatverdzhennia Derzhavnoi stratehii rehional­noho rozvytku na 2021-2027 roky: Postanova Kabinetu Ministriv Ukrainy vid 5 serpnia 2020 r. № 695 [On the approval of the State Regional Development Strategy for 2021-2027: Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine dated August 5, 2020. No. 695]. (2020). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/695-2020-%D0%BF#Text [in Ukrainian].
  2. Storonianska, I. Z. et al. (2021). Terytorialnyi rozvytok i rehionalna polityka. Stymuliuvannia rozvytku rehioniv na zasadakh smart-spetsializatsii: bariery ta mekhanizmy implementatsii [Territorial development and regional policy. Stimulating the development of regions on the basis of smart specialization: barriers and mechanisms of implementation]. Lviv, IRD NANU. 155 p. Retrieved from https://ird.gov.ua/irdp/p20210034.pdf [in Ukra­inian].
  3. Yehorov, I. et al. (2019). Vyznachennia osnovnykh napriamiv smart-spetsializatsii mista Kyieva: zvit pro rezultaty nadannia doslidnytskykh posluh za dohovorom №SSK/2019. Kyiv, Instytut ekonomiky ta prohnozuvannia NAN Ukrainy. Retrieved from https://dei.kyivcity.gov.ua/files/2019/10/22/Zvit_dosl.pdf [in Ukrainian].
  4. Chykarenko, I. A., Mamatova, T. V., Chykarenko, O.O. (2020). Stratehiia rehionalnoho rozvytku na osnovi cmart-spetsializatsii: metodolohichni zasady [Regional development strategy based on cmart specialization: methodological principles]. Aspekty publichnoho upravlinnia – Aspects of public administration, Vol. 8. No. 1, pp. 30-42. [in Ukrainian].
  5. Shevchenko, A. V. (2019). Stratehichni priorytety vprovadzhennia smart-spetsializatsii u promyslovosti Ukrainy [Strategic priorities for the implementation of smart specialization in the industry of Ukraine]. Biznes Inform – Business Inform, No. 10, pp. 130–135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-10-130-135 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Amosha, O. I., Shevtsova, H. Z., Shvets, N. V. (2019). Peredumovy smart-spetsializatsii Donetsko-Pry­dniprovskoho makrorehionu na osnovi rozvytku khimich­noho vyrobnytstva [Prerequisites for smart specialization of the Donetsk-Dnieper macro-region based on the develop­ment of chemical production]. Ekonomika promyslovosti – Economy of Industry, No. 3 (87), pp. 5-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/econindustry2019.03.005 [in Ukrainian].
  7. Shvets, N. V., Shevtsova, H. Z. (2020). Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva ta yoho rol u realizatsii pidkhodu smart-spetsializatsii v Ukraini [The development of entrepreneurship and its role in the implementation of the smart specialization approach in Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbass, No. 2 (60), pp. 53-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2020-2(60)-53-66 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Amosha, O., Liakh, O., Soldak, M., Cherevatskyi, D. (2018). Instytutsiini determinanty vprovadzhennia kontseptsii smart-spetsializatsii: pryklad staropromyslovykh rehioniv Ukrainy [Institutional determinants of implementation of the concept of smart specialization: an example of old industrial regions of Ukraine]. Zhurnal yevropeiskoi ekonomiky – Journal of European Economy, T. 17, No. 3 (66), pp. 310-344 [in Ukrainian].
  9. Marrocu, E., Paci, R., Rigby, D., Usai, S. (2022). Evaluating the implementation of Smart Specialisation policy. Regional Studies, pp. 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2047915.
  10. Wigger, A. (2022). The New EU Industrial Policy and Deepening Structural Asymmetries: Smart Specialisation Not So Smart. Journal of Common Market Studies, June, pp. 1-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13366.
  11. Vechkinzova, E. A. (2018). Obzor teoretiko-me­todologicheskih podhodov k formirovaniyu regional’noj smart-specializacii v Kazahstane [Review of theoretical and methodological approaches to the formation of regional smart specialization in Kazakhstan]. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennosti – Actual problems of the present, No. 1 (19), pp. 111-115 [in Russian].
  12. Patytska, Kh. O. (2019). Stratehiia smart-spe­tsializatsii v konteksti zabezpechennia konkurentospro­mozhnosti rehionu: teoretychnyi aspekt [The strategy of smart specialization in the context of ensuring the competitiveness of the region: theoretical aspect]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy, 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.11.53 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Fediaieva, M. S. (2018). «Rozumna» spetsiali­zatsiia yak instrument transformatsii natsionalnoi ekono­miky (teoretychnyi aspekt) [“Smart” specialization as a tool for the transformation of the national economy (theoretical aspect)]. Prychornomorski ekonomichni studii – Black Sea Economic Studies, Issue 26-1, pp. 87-92 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2022). Stratehuvannia smart-spetsializatsii rozvytku rehioniv z pozytsii klasychnoi ekonomichnoi teorii: problemy v suchasnykh umovakh [Strategizing smart specialization of regional development from the standpoint of classical economic theory: problems in modern conditions]. Suchasni tendentsii rozvytku finan­sovykh ta innovatsiino-investytsiinykh protsesiv v Ukraini [Modern trends in the development of financial and innovation-investment processes in Ukraine]: Proceedings of the V International Scientific and Practical Internet-Conference. (pp. 194-196). Vinnytsia, VNTU [in Ukrainian].
  15. Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2022). Smart-spetsializatsiia rehioniv z pozytsii keinsianskoi shkoly ekonomichnoi teorii [Smart specialization of regions from the standpoint of the Keynesian school of economic theory]. Menedzhment 21 stolittia: hlobalizatsiini vyklyky [Management of the 21st century: globalization challenges]: Proceedings of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference. (pp. 551-553). Poltava, PDAU [in Ukrainian].
  16. World Bank. GDP growth (annual %). Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG.
  17. Foray, D. et. al. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisations (RIS 3). European commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/presenta/smart_specialisation/smart_ris3_2012.pdf.
  18. Chang, H. (2015). Kak ustroena ekonomika [Economics: the User’s Guide]. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov i Ferber. 322 p. [in Russian].
  19. Blaug, M. (1994). Ekonomicheskaya mysl’ v retrospektive [Economic Theory in Retrospect]. Moscow, Delo. 720 p. [in Russian].
  20. Ostrom, E. (2013). Upravlenie obshchim. Evo­lyuciya institucij kollektivnogo dejstviya [Governing the Commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action]. Kyiv. 400 p. [in Russian].
  21. Vyshnevskyi, O. S. (2016). Problemy stratehi­chnoho upravlinnia sotsialno-ekonomichnym rozvytkom Ukrainy z urakhuvanniam protsesiv detsentralizatsii [Problems of strategic management of socio-economic development of Ukraine in view of decentralization processes]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy – Herald of the Economic Sciences of Ukraine, No. 1 (30), pp. 14-22 [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (.pdf)