2021 2(41)18

The Content of the Entrepreneur Profile and the Rationale for the Methodology of Comparative Analysis

Chebotarov Ie. V.
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Assistant professor
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5963-7637;

Chebotarov V. A.
Doctor of Economic Sciences, professor
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-9116
Lugansk Taras Shevchenko National University, Starobelsk

Citation Format
Chebotarov, Ie. V., Chebotarov, V. A. (2021). The Content of the Entrepreneur Profile and the Rationale for the Methodology of Comparative Analysis. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2 (41), рр. 147-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2021.2(41).147-151


The entry of Ukraine into the system of the international division of labor as a full-fledged subject raises a number of issues in the theory and practice of economic comparative studies in terms of substantiating methods for comparing the levels of competence of entrepreneurs from different countries. A prerequisite for solving these issues is the development of the problem of the entrepreneur’s profile. This problem is relevant for countries of both Western (Anglo-Saxon) and Eastern (Japanese) management, as well as for countries of all other types of entrepreneurial culture. This problem is solved in the article on the basis of the scientific and practical triad of economic comparative studies “national business culture” – “corporate culture” – “entrepreneur profile”. A clear identification of the initial category “entrepreneur profile” is substantiated. This is a system of professional (general entrepreneurial), highly specialized, general cultural, psychological and physical competencies (qualities, properties, requirements), identified in the relevant characteristics and their resulting assessments, which a manager of a certain hierarchical level of an organization (enterprise) must possess in order to  adequately fulfill the normative and assigned job responsibilities. In the context of substantiating a unified toolkit for assessing the competencies of entrepreneurs, the authors proposes the following ten characteristics of competencies: “Power distance”, “Individualism”, “Masculinity”, “Uncertainty avoidance”, “Long-term orientation”, “Indulgence”, “Inclination to entrepreneurship”, “Commitment to the business”, “Planning within the enterprise”, “Standardization of business activities”.
The content of these characteristics is revealed. A  description is given of the methodological tools that have been actually tested in the implementation of the Ukrainian-Polish project “National business culture of Poland and Ukraine: improving the scientific and practical foundations of cooperation in the European and world markets” methodological tools – two questionnaires that make it possible to conduct a comparative analysis of the profiles of entrepreneurs from different countries.

“entrepreneur profile”, entrepreneurial competencies, characteristics of entrepreneurial competencies, entrepreneurship, economic comparative studies, national business culture, corporate culture.


  1. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. 328 p.
  2. Hofstede, G. (1994). Culture and organizations: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival – software of the mind. HarperCollins, London. 279 p.
  3. Trompenaars, F. (2007). Riding the Whirlwind. Oxford, UK: Infinite Ideas. 275 p.
  4. Trompenaars, F. (1993). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business. Economist Books, London. 192 p.
  5. Hanifan, L. J. (1916). The Rural School Community Center. Annals of the American Academy of Politicaland Social Science, 67, pp. 130-138. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1013498.pdf.
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. (pp. 241-258). Ed. by J.G. Richardson. New York, Greenwood.
  7. Campbell, J. P., Dunnette, M. D., Hough, L. M. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Palo Alto: Consulting  Psychologists Press. Second  ed. Vol. 1, рp. 687-732.
  8. Bartram, D., Robertson, I. T., Callinen,  M. (2002). Competency and individual performance. Model ing the world of work. Organizational Effectiveness: The Role of Psycholog. Chichester: Wiley, рp. 596–618.
  9. Glinkowska, B., Kaczmarek, B. (2016). Zarządzanie międzynarodowe i internacjonalizacja przedsiębiorstw. Teoria i praktyka. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. Łódź, 290 s.
  10. Rozkwitalska, M. (2018). Thriving in mono- and multicultural organizational contexts. International Journal of Contemporary Management, 17(1), рр. 233-247.
  11. Grishnova, O., Zaichko, O. (2016). Novitni tekhnolohii v ekonomitsi personalu: novi mozhlyvosti y novi vyklyky [Modern Technologies in Labor Economics: New Opportunities and New Challenges]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2, pp. 52-57 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Zaitsev, V. S. (2017). Vybir modeli korporatyvnykh vymoh do kompetentsii fakhivtsia promyslovoho pidpryiemstva [The choice of the model of corporate requirements to the competence of a specialist of industrial enterprise]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of the Donbas, 2(48), pp. 207-213 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Kamenska, O. (2016). Kontseptsiia upravlinnia liudskym kapitalom promyslovoho pidpryiemstva v umovakh innovatsiinoho rozvytku [Conception of management of industrial enterprise human capital is in the conditions of innovative development]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu — Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3 (45). pp. 225-229. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Glinkowska, B., Chebotarov, Ie., Chebotarov, V. (2018). Analysis of the origin, modern characteristics and prospects of determining the profile of Ukrainian manager.. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 3(198), pp. 43-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2018/198-3/5.
  15. Chebotarov, Ie. V. (2021). Natsionalna dilova kultura Ukrainy i profil ukrainskoho marketoloha [National Business Culture of Ukraine and the Profile of a Ukrainian Marketer]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu — Economic Herald of the Donbas, 1(63), pp. 78-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2021-1(63)-78-83 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Chebotarov, V., Glinkowska-Krauze, B., Chebotarov, Ie. (2019). Menedzhment personalu ekonomichnykh pidrozdiliv pidpryiemstv: obgruntuvannia vykhidnykh innovatsiinykh zasad zabezpechennia [Management of personnel of economic subdivisions of enterprises: justification of initial innovative bases of support]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu — Economic Herald of the Donbas, 3(57), pp. 156-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-3(57)-156-161 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Hofstede Insights. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com.
  18. Chebotarov, Ie. V., Glinkowska-Krauze, B. (2020). Instrumentarii prykladnykh empirychnykh doslidzhen natsionalnykh dilovykh kultur. Svidotstvo pro reiestratsiiu avtorskoho prava / Ministerstvo rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva [Tools for applied empirical research of national business cultures. Certificate of copyright registration / Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture] № 97375 from 28.04.2020 [in Ukrainian].

Full Text (.pdf)