2020 2(39)23

Institutional Conditions for the Development of the System of Economic Investigations at Enterprises

Kateryna Mysnyk
graduate student
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-6384
Institute of Industrial Economics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

Citation Format
Mysnyk K. P. (2020). Institutional Conditions for the Development of the System of Economic Investigations at Enterprises. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2 (39), рр. 158-165. doi: https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2020.2(39).158-165

Language
Ukrainian

Resume
At present, there is a need to find new mechanisms for conducting economic investigations in the field of economic activity of enterprises and the introduction of effective methods of control, which can significantly reduce the risk of financial and economic crimes.
The purpose of this study is to substantiate and develop proposals for the creation of appropriate institutional conditions for the development of the system of economic investigations in enterprises. To achieve this goal, methods of analysis and synthesis, comparison, generalization, statistical analysis, expert survey, structural and logical analysis were used.
The article analyzes and generalizes scientific approaches to defining the essence and content of the concept of “forensic”. On the basis of expert surveys of international companies, the peculiarities of forensics as a method of economic investigations at Ukrainian enterprises have been identified. A statistical analysis of the main indicators of administrative offenses in Ukraine has been performed.
To ensure the development of the system of economic investigations at enterprises, it is proposed to create appropriate institutional conditions, namely:
at the legislative level to define the essence of the concept of “forensics as a method of economic investigations in the field of economic activity”, its principles, features, legal, organizational and financial principles of regulating development in enterprises;
to form an appropriate institutional environment, i.e institutions that would control and regulate the process of economic investigations. For example, legislative work is currently under way to establish the Bureau of Financial Investigations as the central executive body that implements state policy to prevent, detect, stop, investigate and detect criminal offenses in the field of economic activity that directly or indirectly harm the public interest. in the field of finance. That is, it is planned to create a single body in which to investigate all economic crimes against the state;
to form an integrated structure of interaction between financial institutions and central executive bodies for the organization of forensics at enterprises of various types of economic activity and organizational and legal forms of ownership;
to develop an organizational and economic mechanism for managing the development of the system of economic investigations at enterprises;
to develop the mechanism of information support of development of system of economic investigations at the enterprises with use of digital technologies.

Keywords
economic crimes, system of economic investigations, forensics, institutional conditions, institutional environment, mechanisms of institutional support, financial institutions, organizational and economic mechanism, information support.

Referensces

  1. Forenzik – efektyvnyi instrument yurydychnoho suprovodu biznesu [Forensic – an effective tool for legal support of business]. Law and business. Available at: https://zib.com.ua/ua/136987-forenzik__efektivniy_instrument_yuridichnogo_suprovodu_bizne.html (accessed 7 September 2020) [in Ukrainian].
  2. Dzwigol H. (2019). The Concept of the System Approach of the Enterprise Restructuring Process. Virtual Economics, vol. 2(4), pp. 46-70. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2019.02.04(3).
  3. Dzwigol H. (2019). Research Methods and Techniques in New Management Trends: Research Results. Virtual Economics, vol. 2(1), pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.34021/ve.2019.02.01(2).
  4. Dzwigol H. (2020). Innovation in Marketing Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis. Marketing and Management of Innovations, no. 1, pp. 128-135. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.1-10.
  5. Dzwigol H. (2020). Methodological and Empirical Platform of Triangulation in Strategic Management. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19(4), pp. 1-8.
  6. Dzwigol H. (2020). Interim Management as a New Approach to the Company Management. Review of Business and Economics Studies, vol. 8(1), pp. 20-26. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X-2020-8-1-20-26.
  7. Dzwigol, H., Dzwigol -Barosz, M. (2018). Scientific Research Methodology in Management Sciences. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, vol. 2(25), pp. 424-437. https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i25.136508.
  8. Dzwigol H., Dzwigol-Barosz, M. (2020). Sustainable Development of the Company on the Basis of Expert Assessment of the Investment Strategy. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19(5), pp. 1-7.
  9. Kharazishvili Y., Kwilinski A., Grishnova O., Dzwigol H. (2020). Social Safety of Society for Developing Countries to Meet Sustainable Development Standards: Indicators, Level, Strategic Benchmarks (with Calculations Based on the Case Study of Ukraine). Sustainability, vol. 12(21), pp. 89-53. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218953.
  10. Marhasova V. H. (2014). Systema zabezpechennia stiikosti natsionalnoi ekonomiky ta yii bezpeky: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka upravlinnia [The system of ensuring the stability of the national economy and its security: theory, methodology, management practice]. Chernihiv, Desna Polygraph [in Ukrainian].
  11. Vlasiuk O. S., Mokii A. I., Illiash O. I. et al. (2017). Bezpeka ta konkurentospromozhnist ekonomiky Ukrainy v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Security and competitiveness of Ukraine’s economy in the context of globalization]. Kyiv, NISR [in Ukrainian].
  12. Kharаzishvili Yu. M., Liashenko V. I. (2017). Problemy otsinky ta intehralni indeksy stiikoho rozvytku promyslovosti Ukrainy z pozytsii ekonomichnoi bezpeky [Problems of assessment and integrated indices of sustainable development of Ukrainian industry from the standpoint of economic security]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 2, pp. 3-24 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Kovchuha L. I. (2018). Pro vzaiemoobumovlenist konkurentsii, innovatsii ta konkurentospromozhnosti pid­pryiemstv [On the interdependence of competition, innovation and competitiveness of enterprises]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of Donbass, 2 (52), pp. 124-133 [in Ukrainian].
  14. Shvets N. V., Shevtsova H. Z. (2018). Udosko­nalennia metodychnykh pidkhodiv do otsiniuvannia konkurentospromozhnosti haluzi [Improving methodological approaches to assessing the competitiveness of the industry]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of Donbass, 2(52), pp. 114-123 [in Ukrainian].
  15. Yeletskykh S., Svynarenko T., Petryshcheva K. (2019). Metodychni pidkhody shchodo otsiniuvannia finansovo-ekonomichnoi bezpeky subiektiv pidpryiemnytskoi diialnosti iz vrakhuvanniam kryteriiu finansovoho resursozberezhennia [Methodical approaches to assessing the financial and economic security of business entities, taking into account the criterion of financial resource conservation]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of Donbass, 1(55), pp. 94-102. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-1(55)-94-102 [in Ukrainian].
  16. Faichuk O. M., Akulovych Yu. A. (2019). Nova ekonomika dlia dosiahnennia tsilei staloho rozvytku v Ukraini [New economy to achieve the goals of sustainable development in Ukraine]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2(37), pp. 21-26. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2019.2(37).21-26 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Perebyinis V. I., Perebyinis Yu. V. (2019). Ekono­michna stiikist ta konkurentospromozhnist ahroprodovolchoho kompleksu yak faktory ekonomichnoi bezpeky [Economic stability and competitiveness of the agro-food complex as factors of economic security]. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Donbasu – Economic Herald of Donbass, 2(56), pp. 22-29. https://doi.org/10.12958/1817-3772-2019-2(56)-22-29 [in Ukrainian].
  18. Shpankovska N. H., Horodianska L. V. (2019). Osoblyvosti orhanizatsii y funktsionuvannia korporatsii v umovakh hlobalizatsii [Features of the organization and functioning of corporations in the context of globalization]. Visnyk ekonomichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 2(37), pp. 44-47. https://doi.org/10.37405/1729-7206.2019.2(37).44-47 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Stevenson G., Crumbley D. (2009). Defining a Forensic Audit. Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 61-80.
  20. Mojsoska, S., Dujovski, N. (2015). Recognizing of Forensic Accounting and Forensic Audit in the South-Eastern European Countries. Journal of Eastern-European Criminal Law, pp. 21-28.
  21. Enofe A. O., Omagbon P. Ehigiator F. I. (2015). Forensic Audit and Corporate Fraud. IIARD International Journal of Economics and Business Management, vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 55-64.
  22. Huber W. et al. (2017). Forensic Accounting, Fraud Theory, and the End of the Fraud Triangle. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 28-49.
  23. Doan M. A., McKie D. (2017). Financial investigations: Auditing research accounts of communication in business, investor relations, and public relations (1994–2016). Public Relations Review, vol. 43, issue 2, pp. 306-313.
  24. Klymko T. Yu., Melnyk O. O. (2015). Udosko­nalennia roboty vnutrishnoho audytu dlia zapobihannia frodiv na pidpryiemstvi [Improving the work of internal audit to prevent fraud at the enterprise]. Naukovyi visnyk Mizhnarodnoho humanitarnoho universytetu. Ser.: Ekonomika i menedzhment – Scientific Bulletin of the International Humanities University. Ser.: Economics and management, vol. 13, pp. 251-254 [in Ukrainian].
  25. Cherniavskyi S.S., Korystin O. Ye., Nekrasov V. A. et al. (2017). Finansovi rozsliduvannia u sferi protydii lehalizatsii zlochynnykh dokhodiv v Ukraini [Financial investigations in the field of combating money laundering in Ukraine]. Kyiv, NAIA [in Ukrainian].
  26. Solomina H. V. (2018). Forenzik – instrument finansovoho rozsliduvannia diialnosti pidpryiemstva [Forensic – a tool for financial investigation of the enterprise]. Naukovyi visnyk Mukachivskoho derzhavnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University, vol. 2, pp. 144-149 [in Ukrainian].
  27. Patsula O. I. (2019). Forenzik yak instrument zabezpechennia bezpeky biznesu [Forensic as a tool for business security]. Upravlinnia systemoiu ekonomichnoi bezpeky: vid teorii do praktyky [Management of the economic security system: from theory to practice] (Lviv, April 19, 2019). Lviv, LvSUIA, pp. 140-143 [in Ukrainian].
  28. Semenets A. O. (2019). Forenzik audyt yak efektyvnyi zasib antykryzovoho upravlinnia torhovelnoiu diialnistiu [Forensic audit as an effective means of anti-crisis management of trade]. Business Inform, no. 4, pp. 280-287 [in Ukrainian].
  29. Kovbel A. Forenzik – chto eto i zachem? [Forensic – what is it and why?] Available at: http://www.grushevskogo5.com/blog/forenzik-chto-eto-i-zachem/(accessed 11 September 2020) [in Russian].
  30. MEB-grupp: monitoring ekonomicheskoy bezopasnosti [OIE Groups: Monitoring Economic Security]. Available at: http://www.mebgroup.ru/forenzik-kontrol/ (accessed 11 September 2020) [in Russian].
  31. Oyedokun G. E. Forensic Investigation and Forensic Audit Methodology in a Computerized Work Environment. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315433931_Forensic_Investigation_and_Forensic_Audit_Methodology_in_a_Computerized_Work_Environment (accessed 11 September 2020).
  32. State Statistics Committee of Ukraine (2011). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2010 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2010]. Kyiv, SSCU [in Ukrainian].
  33. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2012). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2011 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2011]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  34. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2013). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2012 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2012]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  35. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2014). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2013 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2013]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  36. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2015). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2014 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2014]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  37. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2015 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2015]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  38. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2017). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2016 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2016]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  39. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2018). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2017 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2017]. Kyiv, SSSU [in Ukrainian].
  40. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2019). Administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini u 2018 rotsi [Administrative offenses in Ukraine in 2018]. Available at: http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/ (accessed 11 September 2020) [in Ukrainian].

Full Text .pdf