2019 1 (36) 28

Value Management as a Format for Salvation from Suicidal Intellectualism

Olha Zadorozhnaya
Phd in Economics, Corresponding Member of  the AES of Ukraine
Kharkiv National University named after V.N. Karazin

Citation Format
Zadorozhnaya, O. (2019). Value Management as a Format for Salvation from Suicidal Intellectualism. Visnyk economichnoi nauky Ukrainy, 1(36), pp. 169-174. 

Language
Russian

Resume
In the crisis-apocalyptic reality, the disabled intellect plays a leading role, which essentially ignores the spiritual, axiological and social foundations of the development of man and society. In the irreducible technos aspiration, the disabled intellect begins to turn into suicidal intellect, which gives rise to the process of dehumanization. The requirement of post-non-classical man-science to form a new scientific picture of reality makes it necessary to reflect on the imperatives of human life. It is possible only on the basis of value rationality, contributing to the preservation and reproduction of Man-Century. The trialectic method of world-comprehension opens up a new opportunity to create a system of anti-crisis management of national development in the format of developing a strategy for spiritual and noosphere-sustainable economic development. The management of such a strategy is possible on the basis of the development and implementation of three problem-targeted blocks for managing the national anti-crisis economy: the spiritual, moral and ethical and moral unit; bio-genetic block; socio-partner co-evolutionary bloc. To combat suicidal intelligence, there is only one remedy – spirituality. NBICS-convergence, itself oriented to a soulless and soulless functionality, comprehended in the life-saving perspective of a person, must necessarily include the spiritual basis-deployment of the person’s blessing and saving activity. Thus, entering the human dimension of reality, it is necessary to fix the defining moment of spirituality in the title and talk about the DNBICS convergence in the semantic field. This new methodological format opens deeper meaningful levels of crisis management science.

Keywords
disability intelligence, suicidal intelligence, management, post-non-classical man-science, spirituality, spiritual-noosphere-sustainable economic development, DNBICS convergence.

Referensces

  1. Zadorozhny G.V. NBIK-convergence, artificial intelligence as a real prerequisite for replacing a person with a cyborg in a global crisis world (preprint report at the Karazin interdisciplinary methodological scientific seminar January 22, 2019). Kharkov: KhNU named after VN Karazin, 2019. 25 p. [in Russian].
  2. Shulevsky N. B. (2018). Technos or Sphinx. Philosophy of Economy, No. 6, рр. 27-47 [in Russian].
  3. Malinetsky G. G., Samnenkov S. K., Mitin N. A., Shishov V.V. Cognitive challenge and information technology. Retrieved from http://spkurdyumov.ru//economy/kognitivnej-vyzov-i-informacionnye-texnologii [in Russian].
  4. Dyatlov S. А. (2016). Eneiro-network economy: an informational metadisciplinary approach to research. Philosophy of Economics, No. 5, рр. 39-49 [in Russian].
  5. Kutyrev V. A. (2016). Progress of transtechnologies as a person’s negation: critical points of interaction. Philosophy of Economy, No. 6, рр. 209-222 [in Russian].
  6. Osipov Yu. M. (2017). Economics and the figure in the field of view of the philosophy of the economy. Philosophy of Economics, December, spec. Release, рp. 21-24 [in Russian].
  7. Shulevsky N. B. (2018). Teleology and Eschatology of Technology. Philosophy of Economy, No. 5, рр. 15-32 [in Russian].
  8. Osipov Yu. M. (2018). Homos and Tekhnos: who to whom? Philosophy of Economics, № 3, рр. 7-8 [in Russian].
  9. Shulevsky N. B. (2016). Neo-economics, the fate of mutants. Philosophy of Economy, March, spec. issue, рp. 127-141 [in Russian].
  10. Feyerabend P. Science in a free society. Mosсow, AST, 2010. 373 p. [in Russian].
  11. Kutyrev V. A. (2016). Progress of transtechnologies as a person’s negation: critical points of interaction. Philosophy of Economy, No. 6, рр. 209-222 [in Russian].
  12. Zadorozhnaya O. G. (2018). Unom of a personpersonality as a source of the development of a humanized economy. Problems of Economics and Political Economy, No. 1, рр. 21-44 [in Russian].
  13. Tarasevich V.N. (2015). Political Economy: Universality, Universality and Fundamentality. Political Economy, No. 1. Retrieved from http://net.knigi-x.ru/24raznoe/20687-1-politichna-ekonomiya-naukoviy-ekonomichniy-elektronniy-zhurnal-scientific-economic-e-zine.php [in Russian].
  14. Ableyev S. R. (2016). Modeling of Consciousness and Artificial Intelligence: Limits of Possibilities. Delphis, No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.delphis.ru/journal/article/modelirovanie-soznaniya-i-iskusstvennyi-intellekt-predely-vozmozhnostei [in Russian].
  15. Pakhomov Yu. (2008). Bifurcation camp of the core system in front of each other of its leaders. Economy of Ukraine, No. 4, рр. 4-14 [in Russian].
  16. Weber M. Economy and Society [Vols. 1-2]. Vols. 1. New York, 1968.
  17. Krishnamurti Jiddah. Education and the meaning of life. Kyiv, “Sofia”, 2003. 192 p. [in Russian].
  18. Bernanos Georges. Freedom … for what? SPb .: Publishing House of Ivan Limbach, 2014. 288 p. [in Russian].

Full Text (.pdf)